An argument over whether wolves should be returned to Rocky Mountain National Park to reduce an overabundance of elk is moving to a federal appeals court.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Colorado will hear the case Thursday.
The park often has so many elk that they overgraze on trees, shrubs and grass, leaving other animals without enough food and habitat. Few natural predators are left there, and hunting is prohibited in all national parks, so little remains to keep the elk population in check.
The park uses National Park Service personnel and trained volunteers to periodically shoot and kill a specified number of elk. Officials rejected the idea of reintroducing wolves to prey on the elk and control their numbers, saying it was infeasible.
They cited a lack of support from other agencies, safety concerns of people who live nearby, expected conflicts between wolves and humans and the amount of attention that a wolf population would require of park officials.
The wildlife advocacy group WildEarth Guardians sued the Park Service in 2008, asking a Denver federal court judge to overturn the policy. The group said the Park Service didn’t fully consider reintroducing wolves, and that using volunteers to kill elk amounts to hunting in the park, which would violate federal law.
The judge disagreed, upholding the policy in 2011, and WildEarth Guardians appealed to the 10th Circuit.
Rocky Mountain National Park launched a 20-year program in 2008 to thin the elk herd by shooting a number that varies from year to year, depending on the size of the park’s overall herd. The program also includes fencing elk out of some areas to protect vegetation and redistributing some of the animals.